One of the first readings for the week was a video on online scams by BBC news. The video showed how easily someone can be deceived by someone else when they have developed a sincere attachment to their online partner. The main victim in the story lost thousands of dollars, personal information, and most importantly her pride when she found out that her partner was a fraud. This video was also followed up with an article entitled "Online Dating" which was written by Mary Madden & Amanda Lenhart in 2006. The article states that about 66% of internet users say that they believe online dating is dangerous because it puts personal information online and that it is usually females, older people, and people with lower incomes who are the most wary of the risks of online dating. It is so easy for people to take advantage online because in many cases you never see the other person's face. I thought that Emily made a good post as to why these online scams happen. "They are so blind to the truth, because they want to honestly believe there is someone out there who is perfect for them (who loves them for who they are). If only they were educated about the dangers of things like this..." (Online Dating Ignorance, 5/24). There is an old saying that people can be "blinded by love," and I think that is exactly what happens in these online relationships! These people become too attached and are willing to divulge personal information to others in order to form a stronger relationship. Obviously the best way to keep your information and your wallet safe is to keep your personal information offline and if you do feel the need to share it, why don't we try meeting with the person face-to-face.
Another topic talked about this week is how one is perceived in an online dating community. We covered perception online in more depth last week, but I thought it was interesting how perception in an online dating community is very different from other online communities. In the article "Down the Rabbit Hole...," the author states that "the connections stem from emotional intimacy rather than lustful attraction" (Baker, 4). I think this is an interesting concept because we are so interested in physical attraction offline. How can there be such a difference online? Is it because people online are more desperate? No. Is it because people online don't care what their partners look like? No. I think it is because you can really get to know somebody for who they are as opposed to instantly being turned on or off due to their physical qualities. I decided to start a discussion board post about this idea and I received a very intriguing response from Michael. "We cannot help but to notice a person's physical traits. Usually it is the people we do notice, for their attractiveness, that we will talk to and ultimately try to start a relationship with. In terms of online interaction, it seems to work the opposite way. If physical attractiveness is not a priority at first, then more people are possible relationships. However, the idea of physical attractiveness will come into play at some point and will determine whether the relationship continues" (Is Physical Attractiveness Not Important, 5/30). Another point I liked was a comment from La Tocha- "My friend is a member of Zoosk and she refuses to add her pic. She feels that people should get to know each other by finding their likes rather than focus on looks" (Is Physical Attractiveness Not Important, 5/26). Perceptions of others online is always going to be a recurring theme as long as there are online communities; it just depends on how open we are to others personalities and traits that will allow us to see people for who they are.
The last topic I wanted to touch on briefly was the notion of soul mates. In the article, "Expectations of Finding a 'Soul Mate' with Online Dating" by J. Houran, he explains the notion of a soul mate. His definition of a soul mate is, "One of two persons compatible with each other in disposition, point of view, or sensitivity" (Houran, 1)." This definition doesn't sound like my idea of a soul mate. When I think of a soul mate, I think of a romantic partner; someone I will share my life with, not a person with similar interests (this could simply be a friend). I have also gathered after reading the discussion posts the majority of my classmates also feel that there should be some kind of intimate or romantic aspect to a relationship with a soul mate. I do understand how one could perceive friend as a soul mate, but is it really a "soul mate," or simply a best friend?
Over the past week I have tried to improve my discussion board posts. I have really tried to continue conversations with other people who have responded to me in my own posts as well as other classmates posts. I do, however, think I am very active in the discussions and I try and provide interesting and different topics than those posted by my fellow classmates. I like to provide variety on the discussion board because I personally don't want to read the same concepts 30 times and I'm sure my classmates don't either!
I have also been using my Sparklix to record notes every time we have a major reading assignment. I am not a big note-taker on readings anyways, so this is very hard for me. I try and write down some key concepts and put in a few quotes I think are good from the reading. I have also been trying to post a few links to other relevant websites which I think has really enhanced my knowledge for the subject. I usually try and find websites that help clarify the information for me- for example, the online communities readings didn't click with me, so I found another article that helped clarify the concepts!
This week in the proof of learning report I really tried to make at least one reference to the readings and at least one reference to a discussion post in each sub-topic. I think this is important because it allows me to connect my ideas here with the information I have gathered from the rest of the class. I am also including an analysis of how I have improved in my writings of each genre over the past two weeks because I think it is also important to be cognitively aware of how I work in each genre.